The Hindi film Why Him (2025) is a romantic comedy directed by John Hamburg. The screenplay was a collaborative effort by Jonah Hill, John Hamburg, and Ian Helfer. Produced by Shawn Levy, Dan Levine, Ben Stiller, and Jonah Hill, it was presented by Red Hour Productions, 21 Laps Entertainment, 75 Year Plan Productions, and TSG Entertainment. Why Him was released on OTT on June 25, 2025, and has a runtime of 1 hour and 51 minutes.
Why Him 2025 Movie Overviews
| Movie Name | Why Him 2025 Movie |
| Original Language | English |
| Spoken Language | Hindi |
| Release Date | 25 June 2025 |
| Runtime | 1 hour and 51 minutes |
| Country | Untied States |
| Genres | Comedy Drama |
| Writer | Jonah Hill, John Hamburg, Ian Helfer |
| Director | John Hamburg |
| Producer | Shawn Levy, Dan Levine, Ben Stiller, Jonah Hill |
| Production Co. | Red Hour Productions, 21 Laps Entertainment, 75 Year Plan Productions, TSG Entertainment |
आपको जो चाहिए ओ सभी टेलीग्राम पर मिल जायेगे जल्दी कीजिये Join करें
Why Him 2025 Movie Screenshots
आपको जो चाहिए ओ सभी टेलीग्राम पर मिल जायेगे जल्दी कीजिये Join करें
Why Him 2025 Movie Star Cast
| Actor | Role |
|---|---|
| James Franco | Laird Mayhew |
| Bryan Cranston | Ned Fleming |
| Zoey Deutch | Stephanie Fleming |
| Megan Mullally | Barb Fleming |
| Keegan-Michael Key | Gustav |
| Zack Pearlman | Kevin Dingle |
| Andrew Rannells | Blaine |
Why Him 2025 Movie Trailer
Why Him 2025 Movie Review
The cast is a highlight, with Cranston’s sharp comedic timing and Franco’s unfiltered, over-the-top energy driving many laughs. Their dynamic, alongside Keegan-Michael Key’s hilarious performance as Laird’s assistant Gustav, delivers memorable moments, like the recurring Cato-Clouseau-inspired gags. Megan Mullally also shines as Ned’s wife, stealing scenes with her comedic flair.
The film occasionally lands perceptive visual gags and maintains a brisk pace, making it an enjoyable, if mindless, holiday romp for some viewers. Posts on X and some reviews praise its goofy charm, with users like @OfficialMS21 calling it one of the funniest films of 2016. The chemistry between Cranston and Franco is noted as a saving grace, offering a modern spin on the father-vs.-boyfriend trope.
The film leans heavily on juvenile humor—think high-tech toilet gags, moose urine, and excessive profanity—that often feels forced and repetitive, undermining its potential. Critics, like those at Rotten Tomatoes (40% approval rating), call it “misconceived” and “uninspired,” criticizing its reliance on shock value over wit. The script, co-written by Hamburg and Ian Helfer, lacks originality, recycling tired tropes without adding fresh angles.
Stephanie’s character is underdeveloped, serving more as a plot device than a fully realized figure, which weakens the emotional stakes. Pop culture references and cameos (e.g., KISS, Adam Devine) feel shoehorned, and the film’s third act softens into a predictable, sentimental resolution that clashes with its earlier crass tone.
